verio
Discuss a workflow
Session evidence to engineering outcome AgentTrace OSS today ↗

Replay agent work. Follow the outcome.

See failures, retries, and evidence gaps. Connect each session to its pull request, review, and CI result.

Assess one workflow Try AgentTrace
Representative session review Replay OSS today · outcome links under validation
Session AGT-0427 Replay → evidence → outcome
Representative
AgentTrace OSS replay · representative session

Where did this session fail and recover?

Review needed
Session AGT-0427

Claude Code via AgentTrace

Result Recovered after 1 retry

13 tests passed

Privacy boundary Metadata-first

2 secret values redacted

Observed timeline Failure · edit · redaction · recovery
  1. Test command 12 passed · 1 failed
    Failure
  2. File edit rateLimit.ts · retry header
    Observed
  3. Redaction 2 secret values removed
    Protected
  4. Test command 13 passed
    Recovered

Replay finding: A failed test was followed by a retry-header edit and a passing test. The record does not claim hidden reasoning.

Events observable Gaps explicit Decision human-owned Representative data · product concept
Engineering leadership

Decide where agents help, and where they create debt.

Compare accepted outcomes, review load, reliability, and cost by workflow, never by individual.

See leadership decisions Research note · 6 min read The agent observability gap
01Review debt

Where do retries and rework push effort back to reviewers?

02Evidence gaps

Which workflows still lack enough evidence for a rollout decision?

03Reliability

Which accepted changes later fail checks or require recovery?

04Cost

What does an accepted and reviewed outcome cost end to end?

Decision boundary Fund, redesign, limit, or stop the workflow. Never rank the individual.
One work story

One session. One evidence path.

Replay what happened, connect the result, and keep missing evidence visible.

Representative walkthrough · AGT-0427 Choose a stage
01 / 04 · Verified

Prove the session boundary.

IDE context was not exposed by the provider.

Source
Claude Code via AgentTrace
Boundary
Start and end observed
Content
Metadata-first · 2 secrets redacted
Observed or explicit Incomplete evidence Human decision Representative data · product concept
Three decisions

Use the record. Keep the judgment.

Inspect failures, compare accepted outcomes, and manage review, reliability, and cost at the workflow level. Never rank individuals by trace volume.

AOSS today
Developer recovery

Why did this session fail?

Replay observable tools, files, commands, errors, retries, duration, and cost locally with AgentTrace.

Decision Recover the work and improve the next attempt.
BVerio validation
Engineering leadership

Which agent workflow deserves broader rollout?

Compare accepted outcomes, review burden, rework, stability, and end-to-end cost across task and workflow classes.

Decision Fund, redesign, or stop the rollout.
CDesign partner
Review and governance

Can leadership defend the delivery decision?

Put provenance, review, CI, delivery, and missing evidence inside the human decision surface a team already owns.

Decision Reduce review time while keeping judgment human-owned.

Need the full evidence and maturity map?

Explore all use cases

Evidence paths and current gaps

Specific paths, not an undifferentiated logo wall
01

Capture

Provider sessions

Claude CodeCodexCopilot
AgentTrace OSS today
02

Correlate

Engineering outcomes

GitHubPull requestCI + review
Outcome linking · validation
03

Export

Customer-owned evidence

JSONOpenTelemetryCustomer storage
AgentTrace OSS today
2–4 week assessment

Map. Measure. Decide.

Bring one consequential workflow. Leave with an evidence map, a measured gap, and a build, adapt, or stop decision.

  1. 01

    Map

    Days 1–3 · Choose one consequential workflow, name the rollout decision, and identify every evidence source.

  2. 02

    Measure

    Representative sample · Verify metadata-first capture, outcome links, review effort, and one reliability or cost measure.

  3. 03

    Decide

    Written recommendation · Expand, redesign, limit, or stop before anyone commits to a hosted product or broad rollout.

Duration
2–4 weeks
Scope
One workflow
Default
Metadata-first
Output
Written decision
Coding Agent Evidence Audit

Bring one workflow. Leave with a decision.

We map the evidence, measure the gap, and recommend whether to build, adapt, or stop.

Assess one workflow One workflow. No generic platform pitch.